Gehrett v. Chrysler Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[a]lthough a plaintiff may plead and prove multiple causes of action, there may be only one recovery for an injury”
• noting that “[a]lthough a plaintiff may plead and prove multiple causes of action, there may be only one recovery for an injury”
• upholding punitive damages of $88,000 and compensatory damages of $8,500 against a car dealership that misrepresented the features of a single vehicle leased to the plaintiff
• “The law allows a plaintiff to pursue as many causes of action as the facts and good-faith pleading permit.”
• where party’s brief included information de hors the record on appeal, this court “disregarded any improper information” and disposed of the case “based entirely on information contained in the record”
• where party’s brief included information de hors the record on appeal, this court “disregarded any improper information” and disposed of the case “based entirely on information contained in the record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).