Skip to main content
· 5/30/1997

Gehbauer v. Emas, Inc.

Citations

  • 679 N.E.2d 1374
  • 1997 Ind. App. LEXIS 536
  • 1997 WL 283719

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A motion for reconsideration . . . should not be used to put forward additional arguments which the movant could have made, but neglected to make before judgment.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rucker, Sharpnack, Staton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.