Geffcken v. D'ANDREA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that under California's Kelly-Frye standard, expert testimony was inadmissible because appellants failed to show that the relationship between mold exposure and sick building syndrome has gained general acceptance in the relevant scientific community
• applying California’s Kelly-Frye test, derived from People v. Kelly, 17 Cal.3d 24, 130 Cal.Rptr. 144, 549 P.2d 1240, to testimony regarding the relationship between mold exposure and sick building syndrome

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).