Gee v. Utah State Retirement Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when the language is unambiguous, we accord it its ordinary meaning
• concluding, even in the absence of the explicit exclusion of future complications, that the PEHP Master Policy unambiguously exeluded a post-enrollment surgery when the surgery was necessitated by \LecJomplications as a result of other ineligible surgery\ (alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).