Gee v. Utah State Retirement Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that when the language is unambiguous, we accord it its ordinary meaning
• concluding, even in the absence of the explicit exclusion of future complications, that the PEHP Master Policy unambiguously exeluded a post-enrollment surgery when the surgery was necessitated by \LecJomplications as a result of other ineligible surgery\ (alteration in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Utah Farm Bureau Insurance Co. v. Crook
  Utah Supreme Court· 1999-05-11· cited 55×
• Simmons v. Farmers Insurance Group
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1994-06-30· cited 12×
• Phoenix Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Estate of Bell
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1995-05-18· cited 7×
• Kuhn v. Retirement Board
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 2015-01-28· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Zions First National Bank, N.A. v. National American Title Insurance Co.
  Utah Supreme Court· 1988-01-22· cited 98×
• Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Call
  Utah Supreme Court· 1985-12-10· cited 86×
• LDS Hospital, a Division of Intermountain Health Care, Inc. v. Capitol Life Insurance Co.
  Utah Supreme Court· 1988-10-31· cited 75×
• Village Inn Apartments v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1990-04-04· cited 52×
• Bergera v. Ideal National Life Insurance Company
  Utah Supreme Court· 1974-07-16· cited 23×
• Valley Bank & Trust Co. v. U.S. Life Title Insurance Co. of Dallas
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1989-06-23· cited 21×