Skip to main content
· 9/7/1984

Gee v. Chattahoochee Tractor Sales, Inc.

Citations

  • 323 S.E.2d 176
  • 172 Ga. App. 351
  • 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 30
  • 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2505

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rebuilding an engine in a tractor, even though new parts are included, is not a sale since the primary purpose of the contract is to repair the vehicle, not sell the parts
  • look to essence of agreement and see whether goods or services predominate
  • look to essence of agreement and see whether goods or services predominate
  • repairs performed on tractor, which included the replacement of engine parts, constituted a service and not a “sale” under the UCC, as the primary purpose of the contract was to repair the vehicle as opposed to the sale of any component part of the engine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quillian, Birdsong, Carley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.