· 3/11/1995
Geddes v. Cox
Citations
- 880 F. Supp. 767
- 1995 WL 147931
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that this exception did not apply because “[t]here is no indication . . . that Plaintiff wishes to use the money to finance his lawsuit[”
- denying injunctive relief for equal protection claim where plaintiff failed to establish he would “suffer some injury other than a readily quantifiable monetary loss”
- finding the plaintiff’s statements that he is of “limited financial means” to be too vague to support preliminary relief
- explaining “[t]he case law is replete with examples of courts finding no irreparable harm despite the allegation of a constitutional violation where the only remedy would be monetary in nature”
- noting that monetary loss may constitute irreparable injury if “(1) the plaintiff is so poor that he would be harmed in the interim by the loss of the monetary benefits; (2) the plaintiff would be unable to finance his lawsuit without the money he wishes to recover; (3
- observing four circumstances where monetary damages can constitute irreparable harm
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Saffels
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.