Skip to main content
· 5/27/1969

Gebert v. State

Citations

  • 454 P.2d 897
  • 85 Nev. 331
  • 1969 Nev. LEXIS 367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that instruction that accomplice testimony must be corroborated was not so necessary that the failure to give it is patently prejudicial
  • defendant who left container of marijuana with a friend assumed the risk that the friend would consent to a search of the container

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Batjer, Collins, Mowbray, Thompson, Zenoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.