Geary v. Telular Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• collecting cases where Illinois courts have refused to expand the tort of retaliatory discharge
• “Plaintiff accepted the April 1996 modifications to the compensation plan when he accepted payment of commissions under the April 1996 plan and continued employment.”
• at-will employee accepted change to his compensation plan by continuing to work after orally objecting to change
• “When an at-will employee continues to work after a change in commission plan, he is deemed to have accepted the change.”
• “Plaintiff accepted the April 1996 modifications to the compensation plan when he accepted payment of commissions under the April 1996 plan and continued employment.”
• in which the appellate court refused to consider a memo that was contained only in the appendix to the plaintiff's brief and was not a part of the record on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).