Gearhart v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the government’s routine 4 overwrite of the [surveillance video] every sixty days was not a product of ‘official animus’ 5 or of a ‘conscious effort to suppress exculpatory evidence’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).