Gearhardt v. Cadillac Plastics Group, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that sanctions were proper where plaintiff “merely ignored the deadlines and served . . . interrogatory answers one month late”
• noting that dismissal and preclusion would be “too severe” as sanctions for missed discovery deadlines and responses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).