GE Investment Private Placement Partners II v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiffs failed to satisfy the continuity requirement where the alleged scheme “to defraud potential investors and plaintiffs by misleading them into believing the that [the company] was thriving, financially successful business” occurred over two years

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).