G.D. v. Monarch Plastic Surgery

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a party could recover attorney’s fees incurred litigating a motion to compel even when the substantive issues had been resolved through party agreement
• holding that because parties were in the process of rescheduling the challenged depositions, it was unnecessary for the court to issue an order to compel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).