Gc v. School Bd. of Seminole County, Florida

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• special-education teacher’s acts of striking, grabbing, and restraining a disabled student did not “shock the conscience,” because the teacher’s restraints were done for “safety purposes”
• special-education teacher’s acts of striking, grabbing, and restraining a disabled student did not “shock the conscience,” because the teacher’s restraints were done for “safety purposes”
• “[T]he use of foul or belittling language does not amount to a violation of a plaintiff’s constitutional rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).