G.B. v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that challenged IEP does not serve as educational placement for stay-put purposes
• student’s IEP provided for 31 hours per week of specialized instruction outside of general education
• “[W]hen a plaintiff has challenged the student’s educational placement in place at the time the ‘stay-put provision’ is invoked, courts traditionally treat the IEP in place prior to the challenged IEP as the controlling IEP for purposes of the ‘stay-put provision.’”
• student's IEP provided for 31 hours of specialized instruction
• student’s IEP provided for 31 hours of specialized instruction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).