Skip to main content
· 12/6/1905

Gazzam v. Moe

Citations

  • 40 Wash. 593
  • 82 P. 912
  • 1905 Wash. LEXIS 1032

Syllabus

<p>Shipping — Sale of Vessel — Appurtenances—What Are. A crank shaft which had been replaced by a new one, and a new duplicate unattached rudder on a boat, do not pass under a hill of sale as “appurtenances” or “necessaries,” where the vendor had another boat on which they could he used, the vendee did not know of the rudder, and they were not really necessary for the business in which the boat was engaged; since it fairly appears that they were not in the contemplation of the parties, and nothing is considered an appurtenance unless requisite to the use of the boat.</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.