Skip to main content
· 6/15/1838

Gazzam v. Kirby

Citations

  • 8 Port. 253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the statute was unambiguous and supported the United States’ interpretation, but even if ambiguous, Chevron deference was warranted where DoD issued a memorandum explaining DoD’s construction of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Collier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.