Supreme Court· 3/1/1920
Gayon v. McCarthy
Citations
- 252 U.S. 171
- 40 S. Ct. 244
- 64 L. Ed. 513
- 1920 U.S. LEXIS 1673
Syllabus
<p>Engaging another to go to Mexico to join revolutionary forces, under promise of a commission and probable reimbursement for expenses, is a “retaining,” within the meaning of § 10 of the Criminal Code. P. 177.</p> <p>Evidence held sufficient to show probable cause, and sustain an order of removal.</p>
Judges: Clarke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States Ex Rel. Brody v. HechtSecond Circuit· 1926-02-08· cited 21×
- Sandroff v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1949-06-01· cited 20×
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of the StateNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1955-09-30· cited 12×
- United States ex rel. Tassell v. MathuesThird Circuit· 1926-02-16· cited 11×
- Rowe v. BoyleNinth Circuit· 1920-10-18· cited 6×
- United States v. MorseD. Connecticut· 1923-02-25· cited 6×
- Bonaventura v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1932-02-08· cited 4×
- United States v. ConnollyD. Montana· 1943-10-29· cited 2×
- Littleton v. United StateNinth Circuit· 1925-05-25· cited 2×
- In re PothierD. Rhode Island· 1923-01-11· cited 1×
- United States ex rel. Clark v. MathuesE.D. Pennsylvania· 1927-01-18
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-06-10· cited 844×
- Henry v. HenkelSupreme Court· 1914-11-30· cited 141×
- Brown v. ElliottSupreme Court· 1912-06-10· cited 132×
- Tinsley v. TreatSupreme Court· 1907-03-04· cited 100×
- Greene v. HenkelSupreme Court· 1902-01-06· cited 70×
- Price v. HenkelSupreme Court· 1910-02-21· cited 45×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.