Gaynell McCuin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Section 405(h) bars challenges to the amounts of Medicare determinations but not to the procedures used to make those determinations
• explaining that it would frustrate congressional objectives to construe the Act to put “claimants in a state of limbo . . . uncertain of the final outcome of their cases.”
• noting “that the Social Security Act . . . is a remedial statute, to be broadly construed and liberally applied in favor of beneficiaries”
• interpreting the regulations so as to give finality to ALJ decisions beyond sixty days
• appearing to agree with a party’s assertion that, “where only declaratory and injunctive relief is sought for a class, plaintiffs are not required to identify the class members once the existence of the class has been demonstrated”
• appearing to agree with a party’s assertion that, “where only declaratory and injunctive relief is sought for a class, plaintiffs are not required to identify the class members once the existence of the class has been demonstrated”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).