Gaymon v. Gaymon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that extrinsic evidence may be considered when the language of a will is ambiguous.
• discussing how “the context in which [the subject phrases] appear” distinguishes precatory intent from mandatory intent (citing Carson, 198 Va. at 858-59)
• distinguishing \similar\ \phrases\ in wills based upon the different \context[s] in which they appear\
• limiting the relief granted on appeal to the specific relief requested by appellant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).