Skip to main content
· 12/3/1996

Gaya Prasad v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Citations

  • 101 F.3d 614
  • 1996 WL 691112

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that in order to demonstrate past persecution “[i]t is not sufficient to show [petitioner] was merely subject to the general dangers attending a civil war or domestic unrest”
  • determining that the INS had not rebutted the <br> presumption of future persecution, even though the Board had <br> not reached that issue
  • finding that petitioner was statutorily eligible for asylum and remanding to BIA to allow the Attorney General to determine, in exercise of her discretion, whether to grant asylum
  • finding persecution where Indo-Fijian member of the Labour Party was jailed twice for multiple days, beaten, and subjected to sadistic and degrading treatment
  • multiple beatings, being urinated on by military interrogators, and being forced to lick spit off the floor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Kleinfeld, Wilson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.