Gay v. Georgia Department of Corrections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• involving contract containing party’s “general promise to abide by state law in providing a safe workplace”
• inmates were incidental beneficiaries to contract for provision of safety gear because supplier did not agree to render any specifically identified performance to the inmates
• contract language constituting “an acknowledgment of [defendant’s] general responsibilities [rather] than a specific undertaking on behalf of the [purported third-party beneficiaries]” is insufficient to establish third-party beneficiary status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).