Gay v. Brent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he Court analyzes ADA retaliation claims under the same standard as Title YII retaliation claims” and that mixed-motive analysis does not apply to Title VII retaliation claims in the wake of Nassar
• granting summary judgment on retaliation claim, reasoning that temporal proximity alone failed to support pretext
• applying the McDonnell Douglas framework to a plaintiff’s claim of national origin discrimination under Title VII
• \Conclusory allegations of discrimination are insufficient to show that a defendant's non-discriminatory reasons are pretexts and avoid summary judgment.\
• “Conclusory allegations of discrimination are insufficient to show that a defendant’s non-discriminatory reasons are pretexts and avoid summary judgment.”
• “The Court analyzes ADA retaliation claims under the same standard as Title VII retaliation claims.” (citing Treglia v. Town of Manlius, 313 F.3d 713, 719 (2d Cir. 2002))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).