Skip to main content

Gawlik v. Semple

Citations

  • 197 Conn. App. 83

Syllabus

The plaintiff inmate sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the defendants, current and former employees of the Department of Correc- tion, alleging that they had wrongly withheld religious literature and cards that had been mailed to him in violation of his rights to religious freedom under the state and federal constitutions, and the applicable state statute (§ 52-571b) and federal statute (42 U.S.C. § 2000cc et seq.). The plaintiff also alleged that the applicable department administrative directives that justified the defendants' actions were not promulgated in accordance with the applicable statute (§ 4-166 et seq.) governing administrative procedures. The trial court rendered judgment for the defendants, and the plaintiff appealed to this court. Held that the trial court properly rendered judgment for the defendants, and, because that court's memorandum of decision thoroughly addressed the arguments raised in this appeal, this court adopted the trial court's well reasoned decision as a proper statement of the facts and the applicable law on the issues. Argued January 22—officially released April 28, 2020

Judges: Elgo; Devlin; Sheldon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named Gawlik v. Semple

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.