Gavino Cruz-Moyaho v. Eric Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court could “make short work of any due process argument” because respondent lacked “a protected liberty interest in the discretionary relief of a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen”
• applying Chevron deference Nos. 17-3198 & 18-1104 11 to the Board’s interpretation of the Immigration and Nation- ality Act
• dismissing petition for review of second motion to reopen where court could “glean no legal challenges” to Board’s decision
• quot- ing In re Monreal-Aguinaga, 23 I. & N. Dec. 56, 65 (BIA 2001)
• quot- ing In re Monreal-Aguinaga, 23 I. & N. Dec. 56, 65 (BIA 2001)
• Board could not adjudicate case based on information not before it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).