Skip to main content

Gavin v. State

Citations

  • 664 S.E.2d 797
  • 292 Ga. App. 402
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 2509
  • 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 789

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because the legislature could have expressly created the exception urged by [the appellant], we find it instructive that it did not.”
  • “Because the legislature could have expressly created the exception urged by [the appellant], we find it instructive that it did not.”
  • “the legislature outlined in OCGA § 16-11-66 (b) circumstances under which a child’s telephone conversation or electronic communications may he recorded”
  • one-party-consent rule of OCGA § 16-11-66 did not apply to prevent prosecution of defendant for violation of OCGA § 16-11-62 where defendant did not obtain consent of person he video recorded
  • one-party-consent rule of OCGA § 16-11-66 did not apply to prevent prosecution of defendant for violation of OCGA § 16-11-62 where defendant did not obtain consent of person he video recorded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps, Barnes, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.