Gavenda v. Strata Energy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the attorney’s acts and omissions within the scope of his or her authority are regarded as the client’s acts”
• recognizing that the attorney–client relationship is an agency relationship and that the attorney’s acts and omissions within the scope of his or her employment are regarded as the client’s acts
• noting that the \attorney-client relationship is record to determine whether the trial court abused its an agency relationship\
• explaining that attorney’s actions within scope of employment are regarded as client’s acts
• noting that the “attorney-client relationship is an agency relationship”
• declaring “[t]he attorney-client relationship is an agency relationship” and attorney’s “acts and omissions within the scope of his or her employment are 28 regarded as the client’s acts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).