Skip to main content
· 10/25/1989

Gautreaux v. Tex-Steam Co.

Citations

  • 723 F. Supp. 1181
  • 14 OSHC (BNA) 1326
  • 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13090
  • 1989 WL 130824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “For 18 their CPA . . . claims, Plaintiffs have failed to allege facts that establish injury, and therefore 19 Plaintiff[s] lack standing.”
  • “The Declaratory Judgment Act creates only a remedy, not a cause of action.”
  • “The allegations in the complaint are not specific 28 enough to establish that there is any immediate controversy that is about to erupt—indeed, no specific Plaintiffs are alleged to be in default or facing foreclosure . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mentz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.