Gautier v. Watkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to dismiss HAMP-based chapter 93A claim where plaintiffs “sufficiently allege damages, such as fees incurred to avoid foreclosure and harm to [their] credit”
• dismissing 93A based on allegation that the loan servicer was attempting to enforce a structurally unfair loan because the “[loan servicer] did not originate [p]laintiffs' loan and is therefore not liable”
• allegations of damages properly included “fees incurred to avoid foreclosure and harm to Plaintiffs’ credit’
• “The allegations in [p]laintiffs’ complaint are sufficient to state a claim that [defendant] negligently misrepresented the criteria for modification.”
• “To bring a claim for breach of contract, a litigant must be a party to or intended beneficiary of the contract.”
• “[W]ithout a contract, there is no covenant to be breached.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).