Gausvik v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since the claim of familial interference is directly related to all the other constitutional claims appealed by Perez, the other claims form an integral part of the claim relating to familial interference.”
• “Since the claim of familial interference is directly related to all the other constitutional claims appealed by [the plaintiff], the other claims form an integral part of the claim relating to familial interference.”
• plaintiff’s “claims of false imprisonment, 15 16 intentional or negligent infliction of emotional distress, and negligent training and supervision … 17 accrued … when Gausvik was arrested and knew of the basis for his claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Estate of Osuna v. Cnty. of Stanislaus
  E.D. California· 2019-06-24· cited 79×
• Gausvik v. Perez
  E.D. Washington· 2005-05-02· cited 1×
• Hidalgo v. Ricardo Perez
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-03-31· cited 1×
• Ronald Moran Cadillac, Inc. v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-12-16

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKey
  Supreme Court· 1956-06-11· cited 986×
• Leslie D. COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant-Appellee
  Ninth Circuit· 1988-03-10· cited 178×
• Allen v. State
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-03-26· cited 146×
• Lawrence Kates v. Crocker National Bank
  Ninth Circuit· 1985-11-19· cited 32×
• Gausvik v. Perez
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-10-03· cited 28×
• Gausvik v. Perez
  E.D. Washington· 2002-09-16· cited 12×