Gaultney v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a defendant’s place of employment does not qualify as a dwelling or usual place of abode
• holding that service of process was not proper because the place of employment of the defendant police officers did not qualify \as their dwelling house or usual place of abode\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).