Gault v. Medina Cty. Court of Common Pleas Clerk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff did not show a lack of substantial evidence to support the conclusion when the ALJ acknowledged plaintiffs agoraphobia and depression in the analysis
• noting that claimant must present medical evidence supporting his claim and that the evidence allegedly ignored by the ALJ did not show that the impairments met or equaled a listing
• finding that the ALJ’s restricting the claimant from jobs “involving complex work processes or unusual levels of stress” adequately accommodated the claimant’s concentration problems arising, in part, from a panic disorder
• finding that the ALJ’s restricting the claimant from jobs ‘involving complex work processes or unusual levels of stress’ adequately accommodated the claimant’s concentration problems arising, in part, from a panic disorder
• finding VE's inquiry into low-stress, uncomplicated work accounted for limitations arising partly from panic disorder
• finding VE's inquiry into low-stress, uncomplicated work accounted for limitations arising partly from panic disorder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).