Gaulke v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• delay not justified when petitioner knew of newly discovered evidence 25 years prior to his petition
• court properly denied relief on the ground that petitioner, who knew about the allegedly newly discovered evidence for 25 years, did not act with due diligence in seeking relief
• court properly denied relief on the ground that petitioner, who knew about the allegedly newly discovered evidence for 25 years, did not act with due diligence in seeking relief
• “We hold that the district court properly denied the petition on the ground that petitioner, who knew about the allegedly newly discovered evidence in late 1946 and yet did not petition for relief on that basis until 1971, did not act with due diligence in seeking relief.”
• relief denied based on 25-year delay
• relief denied based on 25-year delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).