Gaulin v. Templin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding “[s]ueh testimony does not bar the affirmative defense of contributory negligence”
• inference driver in front was negligent may arise where “the lead vehicle makes a sudden and abrupt stop under circumstances which a court or jury might find to be unwarranted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).