Gaul v. AT & T, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an employer did not perceive an employee to be disabled where the employee “was called back from disability leave to work on a special project”
• finding that testimony of the treating physician is sufficient without separate “expert” testimony
• “Clowes simply required that a plaintiff put forth competent medical evidence that he actually suffered from the ailment he claims is his disability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).