Gauker v. Eubanks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a case commenced by petition in quia timet filed against a particular party to determine interests in a strip of land under the Quiet Title Act of 1966 was “not a suit to ‘establish a dividing line’ as contemplated by [OCGA § 44-4-6]”
• amendment was not “properly before the court” because it required leave of court or consent of the adverse party
• “ ‘The mistake of the parties to a deed cannot be rectified to the injury of an innocent third party who has parted with his money or extended credit on the faith of the deed.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).