Gaudreau v. Priestley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when “cases deal with a clause excluding coverage for injury or property damage caused by an intentional act of the insured . . . . [E]ach insured is held to be separately insured and to stand alone, and the intentional act of one will not be attributed to another.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).