Gaudina v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting rule set out in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328, 107 S. Ct. 708, 93 L. Ed. 2d 649 [1987]
• adopting rule set out in Griffith v. Kentucky, 479 U.S. 314, 328, 107 S.Ct. 708, 93 L.Ed.2d 649 [1987]
• noting adoption of rule set out in Griffith v. Kentucky , 479 U.S. 314 , 328, 107 S.Ct. 708 , 93 L.Ed. 2d 649 [1987]
• Kansas follows \the same rule for finality [for purposes of the retroactive applicability of a new rule] set forth in Griffith.\
• '[T]here is a heightened scrutiny of trial proceedings in a capital case.'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).