Gatto v. Mortgage Specialists of Illinois, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs mere declaration . that she worked more than forty hours per week “nearly every week” does not create genuine factual issue
• distinguishing Mitchell and finding that a mortgage broker employer was a retail or service establishment
• regulation does not literally mean something a consumer uses every day; finding requirement applies to the service of finding and closing loans for purchases of new and existing residences
• “[Defendant] … is hired by purchasers of new and existing residences to per- form the discreet tasks of finding and closing loans …. Once the loan has been closed or refinanced, [Defendant’s] job is done.”
• considering DOL regulations but not competing evidence of industry opinions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).