Gattison v. S.C. State College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that hostile work environment was not outrageous
• finding although plaintiff alleged “unprofessional, inappropriate behavior,” the defendant’s conduct did not exceed all possible bounds of decency
• noting “that mere retaliatory discharge . . . absent claims of verbal assaults or hostile, abusive encounters, did not rise to the level required for the tort of outrage”
• comprehensively surveying the decisional authority in our state addressing claims of intentional infliction of emotional distress and reiterating “our reluctance to permit the tort of outrage to become a ‘panacea for wounded feelings rather than reprehensible conduct’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).