Gatri v. Blane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the development plan had the force and effect of law the proposed development must be “consistent with both the general plan and the zoning” (emphasis in original)
• rejecting the argument that community general plan had no independent force and effect apart from zoning
• rejecting the argument that community general plan had no independent force and effect apart from zoning
• \[A]n agency['s] conclusion of law[ ]... is freely reviewable to determine if the agency's decision was ... affected by other error of law.\ (Internal quotation marks and citation omitted.)
• “[A]n agency[’s] conclusion of law[ ] ... is freely reviewable to determine if the agency’s decision was ... affected by other error of law.” (Internal quotation marks and citation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).