Skip to main content

Gatling v. Rothman

Citations

  • 407 A.2d 387
  • 267 Pa. Super. 566
  • 1979 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2382

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • new trial granted where investigating officer permitted to testify that defendant had not received traffic citation
  • in action arising from automobile collision, trial court abused its discretion in admitting testimony of investigating police officer on cross-examiniation as to fact that defendant had not received a motor vehicle citation
  • in action arising from automobile collision, trial court abused its discretion in admitting testimony of investigating police officer on cross-examination as to fact that defendant had not received a motor vehicle citation
  • no opinion testimony by police officer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Hoffman, Cer-Cone, Price, Van Yoort, Spaeth, Hester

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.