Gatliff Coal Co. v. Hohlman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• SCA claim was adequately pled despite that plaintiff had “not alleged that the data was being stored temporarily, incidental to its transmission, or that it was stored as backup”
• “The Court questions whether Plaintiff will ultimately be able to establish that the Rosy Salon website truly acts as an email or text message provider as intended by the SCA. However, that is a question more appropriately left for summary judgment or trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).