Gatewood v. Koch Foods of Mississippi, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although the act of ‘changing clothes’ itself is barred based on § 203(o) . . . , the activities that occur after changing into sanitary gear and before changing out of sanitary gear are not impacted by the defense.”
• “Although the statute precludes recovery for time spent washing and ‘changing clothes,’ it does not affect the fact that these activities could be the first ‘integral and indispensable’ act that triggers the start of the continuous workday rule for subsequent activities. ...”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).