· 5/3/1926
Gates v. Pickett
Citations
- 12 F.2d 841
- 56 App. D.C. 306
- 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3390
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- taking judicial notice of the fact that surgery can “involve pain and suffering”
- adopting “as federal 10 common law” the “generally accepted rule that, in the absence of a clear contract provision 11 to the contrary, an insured must be made whole before an insurer can enforce its right to 12 subrogation”
- construing ambiguities in favor of the insured
- discussing judicial notice of “[w]ell-known medical facts”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.