Skip to main content
· 5/3/1926

Gates v. Pickett

Citations

  • 12 F.2d 841
  • 56 App. D.C. 306
  • 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • taking judicial notice of the fact that surgery can “involve pain and suffering”
  • adopting “as federal 10 common law” the “generally accepted rule that, in the absence of a clear contract provision 11 to the contrary, an insured must be made whole before an insurer can enforce its right to 12 subrogation”
  • construing ambiguities in favor of the insured
  • discussing judicial notice of “[w]ell-known medical facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.