Skip to main content
· 5/13/1986

Federal Case

Citations

  • 790 F.2d 154

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • invalidating ÓSHA’s interpretation of a regulation as applied to a defendant, but expressing no opinion on “whether, in a non-penal context, the Commission’s interpretation .., might be permissible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.