Skip to main content
· 5/16/1997

Gaston v. Condra (In Re Condra)

Citations

  • 212 B.R. 987
  • 1997 Bankr. LEXIS 1934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Discretionary abstention is available in core and non- core proceedings. Even if this matter were a civil proceeding which is related to a case under Chapter 11, the court should abstain where the case was brought and should be timely heard in a state forum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rodney R. Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.