· 9/30/1998
Gaster Marine Recovery & Sales, Inc. v. M/V \The Restless I\
Citations
- 33 F. Supp. 2d 1333
- 1999 A.M.C. 1809
- 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21714
- 1998 WL 951506
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that repair work “pursuant to the parties’ Brokerage Agreement” in or- der to assist the sale of the vessel was not “independent of and sep- arable from the ‘nonmaritime’ sale element of the Brokerage Agreement”
- finding that although contracts for ship repair normally fall within federal admiralty jurisdiction, the instant contract was not maritime because “the repairs were undertaken to advance the sale of the [vessel] pursuant to the parties’ [sales] Agreement.”
- a contract for the sale of a vessel is not within federal courts' admiralty jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moreno
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.