· 12/29/2005
Gassmann v. Eli Lilly and Co.
Citations
- 407 F. Supp. 2d 203
- 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38112
- 2005 WL 3608917
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment because the court was “satisfied that a jury question exists as to whether [the plaintiff’s] injuries were caused by [defendant’s] drugs”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kennedy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.