Gass, M., Pets. v. 52nd Judicial District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \K.D.S. reiterates that the State does not have the burden to prove a permanent placement exists at the time of termination\
• \[T]he availability of a guardianship is evidence that the trial court should consider when determining whether the State has met its burden to prove RCW 13.34.180(1)(f).\
• because of the interests at stake in a termination proceeding, parents are afforded greater due process rights in a termination proceeding than in a dependency proceeding
• we review denial of continuance for abuse of discretion
• identified guardianship is material to termination decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).