Skip to main content
· 5/6/1918

Gasquet v. Fenner

Citations

  • 247 U.S. 16
  • 38 S. Ct. 416
  • 62 L. Ed. 956
  • 1918 U.S. LEXIS 1987

Syllabus

<p>When the laws of a State provide that final settlement of an estate in ' the probate, court on behalf of a person under interdiction can only be had upon proceedings there setting aside the interdiction or appointing, a curator, a decree of a court of .'another State purporting to establish his sanity notwithstanding such interdiction will not, by virtue of the full faith .and credit clause of the Constitution, operate upon the interdiction directly but,’ at most, would be conclusive in . such probate proceedings.</p> <p>In such case the District Court, sitting in the State where the estate is being administered, can' not dispense with such proceedings in the local probate court and require a settlement from the executors.</p>

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.